Highway Traffic Monitoring Cameras


Traffic Camera
Traffic Monitoring Camera
MoDOT has nearly 300 cameras installed along interstate highways and state routes in the St. Louis area. These cameras help MoDOT’s Transportation Management Center operators monitor traffic flow. They can identify potential congestion creating incidents, such as crashes and stalled vehicles, and direct the appropriate emergency response forces to those incidents. The cameras are also used to monitor the backup from road work zones. Operators use this information to convey messages to the public to detour motorists away or around these congestion points.

Video and photos from the cameras are only available in real time and are not stored. During crashes or incidents, cameras may not remain pointed at recovery efforts as operators continue to monitor the flow of traffic behind the incident. Since traffic is slow or stopped, the potential for additional crashes is increased during major incidents, and operators need to watch for those crashes and direct emergency response forces there, as well.

Camera views and videos are provided on to offer drivers the opportunity to review and evaluate the flow of traffic on their projected route, and determine if they need to use an alternate route. Camera views are also provided to the local media through agreements to provide additional information in media traffic reporting efforts.

Signalized Intersection Traffic Cameras

MoDOT uses cameras at signalized intersections solely for detecting the presence of vehicles in order to provide the timing of the signals based on the traffic demand. They are cost-effective replacements for in-ground induction loops that are cut into the pavement.

The cameras are not focused on you the driver, but instead on your vehicle as it moves towards the intersection. As your vehicle enters defined areas or "zones" within the camera's field of view, the camera's processor detects a change in the "zone". An output is sent to the traffic signal's controller (the computerized "brain" housed in a nearby metallic cabinet controlling the intersection's timing) that says a vehicle is requesting green time for its direction. The signals are then changed accordingly to provide a green light for the traffic at the intersection.

Intersection Camera Frequently Asked Questions:

Why are the cameras attached to the signals so high?

A higher mounting position allows for a better angle and wider view, which in turn generally allows for 1 camera to cover all lanes in a particular direction. Lower mounting heights (at signal indications' height) would not provide an effective image. MoDOT generally looks at mounting heights of around 30', which is at least 10' above the height of the signal indications.

Back to Topics

Who is watching me through these cameras?

There is no constant surveillance or archiving of these images. The camera view is a fixed focus, fixed location image (there is no zooming or moving the cameras once they are installed). The image is analyzed by the camera processor ONLY for the simple presence of vehicles within defined areas or "zones". The resolution of the image by these cameras is NOT good enough to read license plates or distinguish any facial features, as shown in a typical snapshot here:

Typical view from a video detection camera:

Video Detection Camera

The red rectangles are the "zones" drawn via processor software to target the areas to detect vehicles.

Back to Topics

Will I get a ticket if I run the red light or speed through the intersection?

These particular cameras are in no way tied to any law enforcement system. They are solely for detecting the presence of vehicles within their view. They are not capable of producing an image detailed enough to read license plates or facial features.

However, the city of Arnold, the first city in Missouri, has enacted a local ordinance to allow for red light running camera law enforcement. An entirely separate camera system would be installed for this purpose, as the enforcement cameras are much more detailed in their resolution. These intersections have yet to be determined on MoDOT's system, however, when they are determined and installed, they will be prominently signed to differentiate from the two different camera systems.

Back to Topics

Is my privacy being violated?

No. First of all, the cameras are focused on public property and are not aimed onto private property. Secondly, the cameras and their processor are incapable of displaying or sorting through an image which yields any distinguishing features or identification.

Back to Topics

How long are the videos kept?

There is no recording of these cameras. The video is analyzed by the processor in real-time, with no storage whatsoever of the image stream.

Back to Topics

Are these cameras tracking my movements?

Absolutely not. The cameras are incapable of producing an image which renders any specific identification of the vehicle or driver. The camera processor's only function is to determine if a vehicle is within the predetermined "zones". It has no surveillance capability.

Back to Topics

Why go through the extra expense of installing cameras?

Cameras are now the most cost-effective way of performing vehicle detection. Previously, the primary method of vehicle detection was done by cutting the pavement a few inches and installing a wire "loop" just below the surface. This "loop" is charged with a small electric current originating from the traffic signal control cabinet. As a metal object (i.e. vehicle) travels through the electric current's field, the change in the inductance from the metallic object triggers an output that a vehicle is within the "loop". The signal controller responds to this output with orderly green time.

These in-ground loops have both near-term and long-term costs. The labor for a work crew to saw-cut pavement while shutting down that lane of traffic, and the cost of material (wire, conduit, loop processors) are immediate costs. In the long run, additional costs pile up. The saw cutting of the pavement weakens its strength, resulting in shorter service life and more maintenance costs for pavement repair. When in-ground loops fail, the entire loop must be recut into the pavement again, so the labor and traffic disruption costs are renewed.

Video detection cameras, like most electronics, have seen their costs steadily drop since the technology was first introduced. Camera processors, like all computers, have increased their capability as prices drop. Installation is done above the surface of the road, and usually away from the flow of traffic. The pavement remains undisturbed and is capable of lasting longer. When cameras or processors fail, they are simply and quickly replaced without a great disturbance in traffic flow.

Comparing the overall costs of the in-ground loops vs. the overhead cameras today gives the cameras the edge. It is an efficient use of taxpayer money for the job they perform.

IMAGES: What do these cameras look like?

Back to Topics